Henry C. Boler and Sherry M. Boler - Page 24




                                       - 24 -                                         
          disallowed deductions for reimbursements of expenses for which              
          petitioners lacked substantiation; (3) the constructive dividends           
          to petitioner; and (4) the items they conceded.  The Bolers did             
          not show good faith with regard to the claimed interest payments            
          because they offered no records or other documentary evidence               
          (other than the promissory note) of petitioner’s alleged loan to            
          AIM.  There is no evidence about what information they gave their           
          accountants or how the accountants advised them to treat the                
          claimed interest payments or other items on which they did not              
          prevail.  Petitioners did not show that their reliance on their             
          accountants explains their failure to keep adequate records for             
          AIM or the fact that AIM claimed business deductions for its                
          reimbursement of some of the Bolers’ personal expenses.                     
               To reflect the foregoing,                                              
                                                       Decisions will be              
                                                  entered under Rule 155.             




















Page:  Previous  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  

Last modified: May 25, 2011