- 11 -
provided for payments based solely on injury or
sickness arising out of employment. The courts,
therefore, were required to make an inquiry as to the
portion of the statute under which payments were
awarded. * * *
* * * * * * *
* * * Here, however, � 372(a) makes no
distinction between payments for work-related and non-
work-related disabilities and therefore it is not a
dual-purpose statute. * * * [Id. at 1450.]
Unlike the statute in Kane, CGC section 75061(a) specifically
provides for disability retirement benefits based solely on
injury or disease arising out of, and in the course of, judicial
service.8 We hold that the Judges’ Retirement Law is a dual-
purpose statute.9
8We point out that 28 U.S.C. sec. 372(a) is virtually
identical to CGC sec. 75060(a) in that neither of those
provisions distinguishes between work-related and non-work-
related disabilities. However, whereas 28 U.S.C. sec. 372(a)
stands alone, CGC sec. 75060(a) must be read together with CGC
sec. 75061(a), which defines the classes of persons covered under
the disability retirement system. That section does distinguish
between work-related and non-work-related disabilities.
9Respondent argues that the benefits Judge Byrne received
were not in the nature of workers’ compensation. He points to
the award of permanent disability payments of $224 per week as “a
perfect example of how a person injured on the job is compensated
through worker’s compensation and is made whole for his injury”,
and he claims that the disability retirement payments, unlike the
permanent disability payments, were not intended to make Judge
Byrne “whole for his injury”. We might agree that the permanent
disability payments are a perfect example of compensation
received under a workers’ compensation act; however, the question
we have before us is whether the disability retirement benefits
were received under a statute in the nature of a workers’
compensation act. A statute in the nature of a workers’
compensation act gives “recovery in lieu of or supplemental to
workmen’s compensation which may be in excess of that received
(continued...)
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011