Susan L. Castle - Page 6




                                        - 6 -                                         
               On May 1, 2000, respondent issued to petitioner a letter in            
          response to petitioner’s request for relief from joint and                  
          several liability with respect to petitioner’s taxable year 1993.           
          That letter stated, inter alia:                                             
               Ms. Susan Castle is not entitled to relief from any tax                
               liability under the provisions of Internal Revenue Code                
               6015(b), 6015(c) nor 6015(f).                                          
               It was determined that Ms. Castle knew or had reason to                
               know of the deficiency, and she failed to prove that a                 
               hardship would result if she were to pay the liability.                
               On June 23, 2000, respondent issued to petitioner a final              
          notice (final notice) of respondent’s determination that peti-              
          tioner is not entitled to relief from joint and several liability           
          under either section 6015(b), (c), or (f) with respect to peti-             
          tioner’s taxable year 1993.  With respect to respondent’s deter-            
          mination under section 6015(f), the final notice stated:  “It is            
          determined that you do not qualify for equitable relief under IRC           
          Section 6015(f).  You have not established all the elements                 
          necessary to grant you relief.”                                             
               At the time of the trial in this case, the total assessed              
          but unpaid liability with respect to the 1993 joint return (not             
          including certain accruals) was $31,642.34 (the unpaid 1993                 
          liability).                                                                 
                                       OPINION                                        
               We review respondent’s denial of relief under section                  








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011