Susan L. Castle - Page 7




                                        - 7 -                                         
          6015(f) for abuse of discretion.5  Butler v. Commissioner, 114              
          T.C. 276, 292 (2000).  Petitioner bears the burden of proving               
          that respondent abused respondent’s discretion in denying that              
          relief.  See Jonson v. Commissioner, 118 T.C. 106, 125 (2002).              
               Section 6015(f) grants respondent discretion to relieve an             
          individual who files a joint return from joint and several                  
          liability with respect to that return.  That section provides:              
                    SEC. 6015(f).  Equitable Relief.--Under procedures                
               prescribed by the Secretary, if--                                      
                         (1) taking into account all the facts and                    
                    circumstances, it is inequitable to hold the indi-                
                    vidual liable for any unpaid tax or any deficiency                
                    (or any portion of either); and                                   
                         (2) relief is not available to such individual               
                    under subsection (b) or (c),                                      
               the Secretary may relieve such individual of such                      
               liability.                                                             
          In the instant case, the parties agree that relief is not avail-            
          able to petitioner under section 6015(b) or (c), thereby satisfy-           
          ing section 6015(f)(2).                                                     
               As directed by section 6015(f), respondent has prescribed              
          procedures in Rev. Proc. 2000-15, 2000-1 C.B. 447 (Revenue                  
          Procedure 2000-15), to be used in determining whether an individ-           
          ual qualifies for relief under that section.  Section 4.01 of               



               5The Court’s jurisdiction in this case is dependent upon               
          sec. 6015(e)(1).  See Ewing v. Commissioner, 118 T.C. __, __                
          (2002); Fernandez v. Commissioner, 114 T.C. 324, 330-331 (2000);            
          Butler v. Commissioner, 114 T.C. 276, 289-290 (2000).                       





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011