Susan L. Castle - Page 18




                                       - 18 -                                         
          know negative factor, the economic hardship negative factor, and            
          the legal obligation negative factor, respectively.)                        
               We note initially that the parties do not dispute that the             
          knowledge or reason to know negative factor, the economic hard-             
          ship negative factor, and the legal obligation negative factor              
          set forth in section 4.03(2)(b), (d), and (f), respectively, of             
          Revenue Procedure 2000-15 are the opposites of the knowledge or             
          reason to know positive factor, the economic hardship positive              
          factor, and the legal obligation positive factor set forth in               
          section 4.03(1)(d), (b), and (e), respectively, of that revenue             
          procedure.  We also note that the parties do not dispute that the           
          attribution negative factor set forth in section 4.03(2)(a) of              
          Revenue Procedure 2000-15 is essentially the opposite of the                
          attribution positive factor set forth in section 4.03(1)(f) of              
          that revenue procedure.10  We have found above that petitioner              
          has failed to carry her burden of establishing that the knowledge           
          or reason to know positive factor and the economic hardship                 
          positive factor set forth in section 4.03(1)(d) and (b), respec-            
          tively, of Revenue Procedure 2000-15 are present in the instant             



               10Although we do not believe that those two factors are                
          exactly opposite because the attribution negative factor does not           
          contain the word “solely” that appears in the attribution posi-             
          tive factor, we conclude that respondent’s use of the word                  
          “solely” in describing the attribution positive factor but not in           
          describing the attribution negative factor does not affect our              
          findings and conclusions with respect to those factors in the               
          instant case.                                                               





Page:  Previous  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011