- 21 - credible witnesses. Mr. Coyle admitted that he received the receipts but did not keep them. Mr. Coyle’s counsel explained that Mr. Coyle “would reconcile his books and get with his tax man at the end of the tax year, give this information to him, and then, he had no need to keep these receipts.” We are not convinced that an experienced businessperson such as Mr. Coyle would not understand the need to keep receipts. See Korecky v. Commissioner, supra. Mr. Coyle hired Mr. Herman to prepare his Federal income tax returns. Mr. Herman testified that Mr. Coyle did not provide him with many original records and documents when he was preparing Regal’s and Mr. Coyle’s tax returns. Rather, Mr. Coyle provided him with totals of dollar amounts. Mr. Herman’s testimony conflicts with Mr. Coyle’s testimony because Mr. Coyle had asserted that he provided receipts to Mr. Herman. We are inclined to accept Mr. Herman’s testimony. Mr. Coyle and respondent entered into an offer in compromise for 1986, 1989, 1990, 1991, and 1992. In a statement attached to his offer in compromise, Mr. Coyle indicated that he was “employed as a mobile home salesman”. From the facts in the record, it is apparent that during many of those years Mr. Coyle was not only an employee, but he was also a majority shareholder with control over Regal. Mr. Coyle’s dishonesty in his prior dealings with respondent is an indication of fraud.Page: Previous 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011