James J. Coyle - Page 26




                                       - 25 -                                         
               b.   Mr. Coyle                                                         
               Because the underpayments of tax due from Mr. Coyle were               
          attributable to fraud under section 6663, respondent is not                 
          barred from assessing the deficiencies determined against Mr.               
          Coyle for 1992 and 1993.  Sec. 6501(c)(1).  Because we have                 
          concluded that the periods of limitations have not expired under            
          section 6501(c)(1) with respect to Mr. Coyle, we need not                   
          consider whether section 6501(e) is applicable.                             
               Reviewed and adopted as the report of the Small Tax Case               
          Division.                                                                   


                                             Decision will be entered for             
                                        respondent in docket No. 12012-99S            
                                        and for petitioner in docket No.              
                                        12061-99S.                                    






















Page:  Previous  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  

Last modified: May 25, 2011