Electronic Arts, Inc. and Subsidiaries - Page 54




                                       - 54 -                                         
          manufacturing is to be given a special unfavorable (for the                 
          taxpayer) effect only for purposes of section 936(h)(5)(B), and             
          that for all other section 936 purposes contract manufacturing is           
          not to be given an effect unfavorable to the taxpayer.  It                  
          follows that the canon of construction that respondent urges upon           
          us does not lead to the result for which respondent contends, but           
          rather (when the context is considered) it supports the result              
          for which petitioners contend.                                              
                       iii. Plain Meaning; Legislative History                        
               Respondent contends that the plain meaning of “such domestic           
          corporation” in the statute, and the plain meaning of “it” and              
          “its gross income” in the report of the Senate Finance Committee,           
          lead to the conclusion that “only the possessions corporation’s             
          conduct can be considered for purposes of satisfying the active             
          business requirement.”                                                      
               The same statutory language has been in the predecessors of            
          section 936 since the initial enactment--section 262 of the                 
          Revenue Act of 1921, Pub. L. 67-98, 42 Stat. 227, 271.  The same            
          statutory language was in the WHTC provisions--sec. 109, I.R.C.             
          1939.  Essentially the same argument was presented to, and                  
          rejected by, the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Frank            
          v. International Canadian Corp., 308 F.2d at 526-527.  In our               
          recent opinion in MedChem (P.R.), Inc. v. Commissioner, 116 T.C.            








Page:  Previous  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  59  60  61  62  63  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011