Lee G. Gale - Page 15




                                       - 15 -                                         
          does not disclose the source of funds petitioner used to repay              
          the loan.                                                                   
               During 1994, petitioner deposited $187,574 into the trust              
          bank account, which included the 12 checks of J&J Trucking                  
          previously described.  The 1994 fiduciary return for the living             
          trust reported total gross income of $58,859, consisting of:                
          Interest $70, rental income from Onyx property $26,359, and                 
          rental income from 31st Street property $32,430.                            
          Statutory Notice Adjustments and Respondent’s Concessions                   
               1992 Individual Return                                                 
               On October 7, 1996, respondent issued a notice of deficiency           
          (1992 notice) to petitioner determining a deficiency, addition,             
          and penalty for the year ended December 31, 1992.  After                    
          concessions,4 respondent has continued to assert adjustments for            
          the following items: (1) Unreported interest income of $5,599               
          from J&J Trucking, (2) unsubstantiated NOL carryforward of                  
          $148,367 to 1992, (3) unsubstantiated cost of goods sold                    
          reduction of $890,5005 related to petitioner’s Schedule C                   


               4 Respondent conceded that petitioner was entitled to deduct           
          capital losses of $3,000, was not subject to tax on $38,048 of              
          deposits made to the living trust, and was not subject to self-             
          employment tax because he had no self-employment income in 1992.            
               5                                                                      
          As previously stated, petitioner claimed an offset for cost of              
          goods sold of $925,500 on his Schedule C for 1992.  The parties             
          agree that petitioner is not entitled to a reduction for cost of            
          goods sold because petitioner did not produce goods.  However,              
          petitioner established, and the 1992 notice of deficiency                   
          reflects that respondent allowed, a business deduction for                  
                                                             (continued...)           




Page:  Previous  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011