Lee G. Gale - Page 17




                                       - 17 -                                         
          Unreported interest income of $16,796 from J&J Trucking for 1993            
          and 1994, (2) unreported income of $17,300 related to a currency            
          transaction in 1993, (3) an unsubstantiated NOL carryforward of             
          $323,352 to 1994, (4) unreported rental activity income of                  
          $55,939 in 1994, (5) net trust expenses of $14,000 allowed by               
          respondent to offset petitioner’s individual income tax liability           
          in 1994, and (6) computational adjustments related to personal              
          exemptions and taxation of Social Security benefits received in             
          1994.                                                                       
                                       OPINION                                        
          Procedural Matters                                                          
               Before trial, petitioner filed a motion to dismiss the cases           
          at hand on the three following grounds:  (1) The 1992 and                   
          1993/1994 notices were “naked assessments”; (2) the written                 
          acceptance of petitioner’s 1993 and 1994 tax returns after audit            
          (no change letter) was conclusive of all tax matters for those              
          years; and (3) petitioner was denied his due process rights under           
          the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution because he was not                  
          allowed to confront representatives of United Ready Mixed at                
          trial.  We denied petitioner’s motion for the reasons stated                
          below.                                                                      
               “Naked Assessment” Argument                                            
               In general, a deficiency notice is presumed correct and the            
          taxpayer has the burden of proving it wrong.  Rule 142(a)(1);               







Page:  Previous  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011