Lee G. Gale - Page 25




                                       - 25 -                                         
          enjoy at his own option may be taxed to him as his income,                  
          whether he sees fit to enjoy it or not.”).                                  
               Petitioner assumes he did not have taxable receipt of the              
          settlement proceeds because the funds were paid directly from               
          United Ready Mixed to petitioner’s attorney and did not pass                
          through his hands.  However, taxable receipt is not limited to              
          physical receipt by the payee.  Taxable receipt also occurs when            
          funds are received by the payee’s agent on the payee’s behalf10             
          or by a creditor of the payee on account of the payee’s debt.11             


               10“[R]eceipt by an agent is receipt by the principal.”                 
          Arnwine v. Commissioner, 696 F.2d 1102, 1107 (5th Cir. 1983),               
          revg. 76 T.C. 532 (1981).  Therefore, any agreement between the             
          payee and the payee’s agent to defer recognition of the income is           
          ineffective to defer taxable receipt.  Id.; Warren v. United                
          States, 613 F.2d 591 (5th Cir. 1980) (attempt by farmer through             
          agreement with cotton gin to defer recognition of income from               
          sale of cotton ineffective because gin was acting as agent for              
          farmer in receiving sale proceeds).                                         
               11Old Colony Trust Co. v. Commissioner, 279 U.S. 716, 729              
          (1929), held that an employer’s payment of the employee’s taxes             
          constituted receipt by the employee:                                        
               The payment of the tax by the employers was in                         
               consideration of the services rendered by the employee                 
               and was a gain derived by the employee from his labor.                 
               The form of the payment is expressly declared to make                  
               no difference. * * * It is therefore immaterial that                   
               the taxes were directly paid over to the Government.                   
               The discharge by a third person of an obligation to him                
               is equivalent to receipt by the person taxed. * * *  We                
               think therefore that the payment constituted income to                 
               the employee.                                                          
          See also Young v. Commissioner, 113 T.C. 152 (1999) (applying               
          rule of Old Colony Trust Co. to sale proceeds paid directly to              
          taxpayer’s attorney), affd. 240 F.3d 369 (4th Cir. 2001).                   






Page:  Previous  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011