Estate of Frances C. Glover, a.k.a. Frances C. Cloud, Deceased, Kevin Holleran and Wilmington Trust Co., Administrators Pro Tem - Page 41




                                       - 41 -                                         
          being administered.  Sec. 2053; Estate of Swayne v. Commissioner,           
          43 T.C. 190 (1964).  The amounts deductible as administration               
          expenses are limited to such expenses as are actually and                   
          necessarily incurred in the administration of the decedent’s                
          estate.  Sec. 20.2053-3(a), Estate Tax Regs.  Expenditures not              
          essential to the proper settlement of the estate but incurred for           
          the individual benefit of the heirs, legatees, or devisees are not          
          allowed as deductions.  Id.  Further, attorney’s fees incurred by           
          beneficiaries incident to litigation as to their respective                 
          interests are not deductible if the litigation is not essential to          
          the proper settlement of the estate.  Sec. 20.2053-3(c)(3), Estate          
          Tax Regs.                                                                   
               Respondent concedes that the services provided by Mr. Glover           
          and the Glovers’ attorneys led to the discovery of Ms. Hurley’s             
          misappropriation and the Eckell, Sparks malpractice, and the                
          removal of Ms. Hurley as executrix.  Respondent also agrees that            
          the services were essential to the proper settlement of the estate.         
          Respondent argues, however, that services provided by the attorneys         
          for the Glovers’ will contest and for the attorneys’ involvement in         
          the malpractice litigation were unnecessary to the settlement of            
          the estate and were primarily for the personal benefit of the               
          Glovers.   Furthermore, respondent contends that the record in this         
          case does not establish the portion of the fees allocable to the            








Page:  Previous  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011