- 22 - Systems’ prospects to enter the “videodisc instructional systems” market. Clark understood that “Funds are to be raised in a tax advantaged Subchapter S investment vehicle” and these funds would be used by Systems to further Systems’ business efforts. In this letter, Clark, as vice president of Scott & Stringfellow, Inc., was offering the services of his firm “to act as investment bankers for Systems”. Systems and IRC entered into three agreements. RIC got folded into these agreements in some manner not clearly disclosed in the record. The R & D Agreement required IRC (and RIC?) to make payments to Systems on a specified schedule in consideration of Systems’ performing research, and required Systems to provide monthly reports to IRC (and RIC?). The R & D Agreement was respected only in part by the parties thereto. The parties herein have stipulated that the payments were not made in accordance with the R & D Agreement schedule. The parties herein have stipulated that Systems did not provide any written periodic reports to IRC or RIC, much less the monthly reports mandated by the R & D Agreement. The R & D Agreement gave to IRC and RIC exclusive ownership of whatever Systems’ research developed. However, the parties herein agree that “The research under the R & D Agreement was not intended to and did not result in any commercially viable product.” Although Systems failed to provide written monthly reports, it did conduct frequent meetings withPage: Previous 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011