Henry A. Julicher - Page 32




                                       - 32 -                                         
          reported as one line item on the 1994 return.  That rent was well           
          in excess of the $44,000 debt Ms. Weinstein owed petitioner,                
          suggesting her ability to pay.  Moreover, even if Ms. Weinstein’s           
          successive businesses were “insolvent” at the end of each season,           
          as she told petitioner, she maintained the businesses as going              
          concerns, providing an apparent source from which to pay the                
          debt.  Cf. Riss v. Commissioner, 56 T.C. 388, 408 (1971) (even              
          where liabilities of business exceed assets, fact that it                   
          continues to operate as going concern is evidence that its debts            
          are not uncollectible), affd., revd. and remanded on another                
          issue 478 F.2d 1160 (8th Cir 1973), affd. sub nom. Commissioner             
          v. Transport Manufacturing & Equip. Co., 478 F.2d 731 (8th Cir.             
          1973).  As respondent points out on brief, the fact that Ms.                
          Weinstein’s business, Indian Falls, failed in 1994, which might             
          suggest that she no longer had a source of income to pay the                
          debt, see Bowman v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1995-259, is                   
          unavailing to petitioner here:  Ms. Weinstein began a new                   
          business in July 1994.  Thus, not only has petitioner failed to             
          point to an identifiable event indicating the debt was                      
          uncollectible, the evidence shows that Ms. Weinstein had sources            
          from which to pay the debt.  Petitioner has failed to prove the             
          Weinstein debt became worthless in 1994, and we sustain                     
          respondent’s disallowance of the bad debt deduction.                        








Page:  Previous  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011