Curtis B. Keene - Page 3




                                        - 3 -                                         
          Background                                                                  
               A.  Petitioner’s Form 1040 for 1997                                    
               On or about August 25, 1998, Curtis B. Keene (petitioner)              
          and his wife Fanny Keene2 submitted to respondent a joint Form              
          1040, U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, for the taxable year               
          1997.  On the Form 1040, petitioner listed his occupation as                
          “parts representative”, and his wife listed her occupation as               
          “assembler”.                                                                
               Petitioner entered zeros on applicable lines of the income             
          portion of his Form 1040, specifically including line 7 for                 
          wages, line 22 for total income, lines 32 and 33 for adjusted               
          gross income, and line 38 for taxable income.  Petitioner also              
          entered zeros on line 39 for tax and on line 53 for total tax.              
          Petitioner then claimed a refund in the amount of $2,342.02,                
          which was equal to the amount of Federal income tax that had been           
          withheld from wages.                                                        
               Petitioner attached to his Form 1040 three Forms W-2, Wage             
          and Tax Statement, disclosing the payment of wages to him and his           
          wife during 1997.  The first Form W-2 was from APCO Equipment               
          Corp. of Las Vegas, Nevada; it disclosed the payment of wages to            
          petitioner in the amount of $24,464.61 and the withholding of               
          Federal income tax in the amount of $854.35.  The second Form W-2           

               2  Fanny Keene did not file with the Court a petition for              
          lien or levy action.  See infra G.  Accordingly, she is not a               
          party to the present proceeding.                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011