E. Carolyn Mellen - Page 33




                                                - 33 -                                                  
            by Questar since 1989; (2) was earning annual compensation of                               
            $38,160 at the time of the trial in this case; (3) contributed                              
            regularly each pay period to the Questar retirement plan;                                   
            (4) invested monthly in a mutual fund; (5) invested regularly                               
            each pay period in savings bonds; (6) has undisclosed assets in a                           
            trust; and (7) has an inheritance from her “parent’s estate”.                               
            The record also establishes (1) that at the time of the trial in                            
            this case Mr. Mellen was receiving monthly SS disability benefits                           
            of $949 and was entitled as of April 1999 to hospital insurance                             
            under Medicare, (2) that petitioner and Mr. Mellen owned peti-                              
            tioner’s residence and their automobiles free and clear of any                              
            encumbrances, (3) that petitioner’s residence had an assessed                               
            market value of $317,900 in 2000 and $310,100 in 2001, and                                  
            (4) that petitioner has not attempted to obtain a loan secured by                           
            petitioner’s residence in order to pay petitioner’s unpaid                                  
            liability for 1995.                                                                         
                  On the record before us, we find that petitioner has failed                           
            to carry her burden of establishing that the economic hardship                              
            positive factor set forth in section 4.03(1)(b) of Revenue                                  
            Procedure 2000-15 is present in the instant case.                                           
                  With respect to the abuse positive factor set forth in                                
            section 4.03(1)(c) of Revenue Procedure 2000-15, petitioner                                 
            concedes that that positive factor is not present in the instant                            
            case.                                                                                       






Page:  Previous  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011