Metro Leasing and Development Corporation, East Bay Chevrolet Company, a Corporation - Page 2




                                                - 2 -                                                   
                        All three reductions proposed by P require our                                  
                  interpretation of sec. 535(b), I.R.C.  Proposed                                       
                  reductions (1) and (2) involve the interpretation of                                  
                  sec. 535(b)(1), I.R.C., and sec. 1.535-2(a)(1), Income                                
                  Tax Regs.  Reduction (3) involves sec. 535(b)(6),                                     
                  I.R.C.  Reductions (1) and (3) present questions of                                   
                  first impression.  With respect to reduction (2), this                                
                  Court’s decision on the issue was reversed by the Court                               
                  of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in J.H. Rutter Rex                                   
                  Manufacturing Co. v. Commissioner, 853 F.2d 1275 (5th                                 
                  Cir. 1987), revg. on this point T.C. Memo. 1987-296.                                  
                  If we follow the holding of the Court of Appeals, P                                   
                  would be entitled to a reduction for the paid, but                                    
                  still contested, income tax deficiency.  R urges this                                 
                  Court not to follow the holding of the Court of                                       
                  Appeals.                                                                              
                        Held:  This Court will not follow the holding of                                
                  Court of Appeals on this point in Rutter Rex.  Held,                                  
                  further, sec. 535(b), I.R.C., and underlying                                          
                  regulations are interpreted, and R’s computation of P’s                               
                  accumulated earnings tax liability is correct.                                        


                  William L. Raby, for petitioner.                                                      
                  Kathryn K. Vetter, for respondent.                                                    

                                       SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION1                                            
                  GERBER, Judge:  In an earlier opinion, we decided that                                
            petitioner permitted its 1995 earnings to accumulate beyond the                             


                  1 On May 18, 2001, this Court filed a Memorandum Findings Of                          
            Fact And Opinion, Metro Leasing & Dev. Corp., East Bay Chevrolet                            
            Co., A Corporation v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2001-119, in two                             
            consolidated cases (docket Nos. 8054-99 and 8055-99) stating that                           
            decisions would be entered pursuant to Rule 155 of the Court’s                              
            Rules of Practice and Procedure in both docket numbers.  On Sept.                           
            20, 2001, in docket No. 8055-99, Respondent’s Computation For                               
            Entry Of Decision (together with a proposed decision document)                              
            was filed.  On Oct. 3, 2001, by order of this Court, the                                    
            consolidated cases at docket No. 8054-99 and docket No. 8055-99                             
            were severed.  On Oct. 5, 2001, a decision was entered in docket                            
            No. 8055-99.                                                                                




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011