Metro Leasing and Development Corporation, East Bay Chevrolet Company, a Corporation - Page 6




                                                - 6 -                                                   
                  According to petitioner, the quoted phrase changes all                                
            taxpayers’ methods of reporting income for purposes of section                              
            535(b)(1) to the accrual method.  Petitioner contends that the                              
            phrase “regardless of whether the corporation uses an accrual                               
            method of accounting, the cash receipts and disbursements method,                           
            or any other allowable method of accounting” modifies the                                   
            statutory phrase “taxes accrued during the taxable year”.  In                               
            other words, petitioner argues that the taxes that accrued during                           
            the 1995 year should include future years’ installment sale                                 
            income as though petitioner had reported the entire sale under                              
            the accrual method for 1995.  Computing the accrued tax in the                              
            manner proposed by petitioner would result in no accumulated                                
            taxable income and, therefore, no accumulated earnings tax                                  
            liability.                                                                                  
                  Respondent disagrees with petitioner and points out that the                          
            language of section 1.535-2(a)(1), Income Tax Regs., was not                                
            intended to change petitioner’s method for reporting income from                            
            the installment to the accrual method.  In that regard,                                     
            respondent contends that section 535(b)(1) and the underlying                               
            regulation concern the amount of tax that “accrued during the                               
            taxable year”.  Respondent also contends that petitioner’s post-                            
            1995 installment sale income does not meet the well-established                             
            standard for accrual of the income and/or tax during petitioner’s                           
            1995 Federal tax year.                                                                      






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011