Metro Leasing and Development Corporation, East Bay Chevrolet Company, a Corporation - Page 11




                                                - 11 -                                                  
            accumulated earnings tax base.9  Respondent disagrees, contending                           
            that the income tax deficiency did not accrue during the taxable                            
            year as required by section 535(b)(1) because petitioner                                    
            continues to contest it.  In support of his argument, respondent                            
            relies on the well-established standards for accrual (the “all                              
            events test”), contending that a contested tax liability does not                           
            meet that test.                                                                             
                  Petitioner relies on the holding in J.H. Rutter Rex                                   
            Manufacturing. Co. v. Commissioner, 853 F.2d 1275 (5th Cir.                                 
            1988), revg. T.C. Memo. 1987-296 (Rutter Rex).10  The rationale                             
            of that case focuses on the word “unpaid” in section 1.535-                                 





                  9 A taxpayer’s Federal income tax liability is not                                    
            deductible in arriving at taxable income.  See sec. 275.  A                                 
            Federal income tax liability that “accrued during the taxable                               
            year” is allowed as a deduction from the tax base for the                                   
            accumulated earnings tax.  See sec. 535(b)(1).                                              
                  10 Our J.H. Rutter Rex Manufacturing Co. v. Commissioner                              
            opinion (T.C. Memo. 1987-296) (Rutter Rex) was reversed during                              
            1988 (Rutter Rex, 853 F.2d 1275 (5th Cir. 1988).  We consider in                            
            this opinion whether we will follow the holding of the Court of                             
            Appeals for the Fifth Circuit or adhere to our established                                  
            holding on this question.  Since the reversal, this point has not                           
            been addressed by this Court or any other court.  Any appeal of                             
            our decision in these consolidated cases would normally lie with                            
            the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit because petitioner’s                             
            principal place of business was in California.  See sec.                                    
            7482(b)(1)(B).  The Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has                              
            not addressed the question we consider here.  Even though this                              
            Court may disagree with an appellate court holding that is                                  
            squarely on point, we shall follow the appellate court holding if                           
            that court is the venue for appeal.  See Golsen v. Commissioner,                            
            54 T.C. 742 (1970), affd. 445 F.2d 985 (10th Cir. 1971).                                    




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011