- 7 - log, on numerous occasions during the hours of 6 p.m. and 10 p.m., petitioner was engaged in other activities. These hours are also included in the total hours reported in the log, in effect duplicating, or double counting the same hours. We accept petitioner’s claim that he could do more than one thing at any given time, but any hour within which multiple tasks were performed should only be counted once. Accordingly, we find that the disputed hours cannot be considered hours spent by petitioner performing personal services in connection with his rental activities. Deducting the disputed hours from the total hours recorded in the log leaves 1,000 hours. Petitioner performed at least 1,834 hours of services as an employee of the Department in 1996. Consequently, he did not perform more than one-half of his personal services during that year in real property trades or businesses in which he materially participated. Accordingly, respondent’s determination that petitioner is not entitled to a deduction for the rental real estate loss he incurred in 1996 is sustained.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011