Steve M. and Khristine Norton, et al. - Page 14




                                       - 14 -                                         
               Respondent presented alternative arguments as to why Mr. and           
          Mrs. Norton should be taxed individually on the incomes reported            
          by the trusts.  First, respondent argues that the trusts are                
          shams and should be disregarded for tax purposes because the                
          trusts lack economic substance.  Second, respondent argues that             
          the South Denali Lands and Denali Company trusts are grantor                
          trusts.  Third, respondent argues that income of the South Denali           
          Lands and Denali Company trusts is taxable to Mr. and Mrs. Norton           
          on assignment of income principles.                                         
               A fundamental principle of tax law is that income is taxed             
          to the person who earns it.  Commissioner v. Culbertson, 337 U.S.           
          733, 739 (1949); Lucas v. Earl, 281 U.S. 111, 114 (1930);                   
          Johnston v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2000-315.  An assignment of            
          income to a trust is ineffective to shift the tax burden from the           
          taxpayer to a trust when the taxpayer controls the earning of the           
          income.  Vnuk v. Commissioner, 621 F.2d 1318, 1320 (8th Cir.                
          1980), affg. T.C. Memo. 1979-164.                                           
               The Commissioner is not required to apply the tax laws in              
          accordance with the form a taxpayer employs where that form is a            
          sham or inconsistent with economic reality.  Diedrich v.                    
          Commissioner, 457 U.S. 191, 195 (1982); Higgins v. Smith, 308               
          U.S. 473, 477 (1940).  Where an entity is created that has no               
          real economic effect and which affects no cognizable economic               
          relationships, the substance of a transaction involving this                






Page:  Previous  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011