- 14 - Respondent presented alternative arguments as to why Mr. and Mrs. Norton should be taxed individually on the incomes reported by the trusts. First, respondent argues that the trusts are shams and should be disregarded for tax purposes because the trusts lack economic substance. Second, respondent argues that the South Denali Lands and Denali Company trusts are grantor trusts. Third, respondent argues that income of the South Denali Lands and Denali Company trusts is taxable to Mr. and Mrs. Norton on assignment of income principles. A fundamental principle of tax law is that income is taxed to the person who earns it. Commissioner v. Culbertson, 337 U.S. 733, 739 (1949); Lucas v. Earl, 281 U.S. 111, 114 (1930); Johnston v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2000-315. An assignment of income to a trust is ineffective to shift the tax burden from the taxpayer to a trust when the taxpayer controls the earning of the income. Vnuk v. Commissioner, 621 F.2d 1318, 1320 (8th Cir. 1980), affg. T.C. Memo. 1979-164. The Commissioner is not required to apply the tax laws in accordance with the form a taxpayer employs where that form is a sham or inconsistent with economic reality. Diedrich v. Commissioner, 457 U.S. 191, 195 (1982); Higgins v. Smith, 308 U.S. 473, 477 (1940). Where an entity is created that has no real economic effect and which affects no cognizable economic relationships, the substance of a transaction involving thisPage: Previous 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011