Zabetti A. Pappas - Page 52




                                       - 52 -                                         
          V.  Whether Petitioner May Deduct Business Expenses in Excess of            
          Those Allowed by Respondent                                                 
               A. Business Expenses in 1989                                           
               Petitioner maintains that, if we find that she was engaged             
          in providing escort services, respondent has failed to allow her            
          a sufficient deduction for the amounts she was required to pay to           
          the women she arranged to engage in those services.  Petitioner             
          strenuously denies that she was engaged in providing escort                 
          services.  Nevertheless, she argues in the alternative that if we           
          find she was engaged in such a business, we should allow her to             
          deduct 50 to 60 percent of the gross receipts in recognition of             
          the fact that she was required to pay the women who actually                
          rendered the services.                                                      
               Under certain circumstances, where a taxpayer establishes              
          his entitlement to a deduction, but does not establish the amount           
          of the deduction, we are permitted to estimate the amount                   
          allowable.  Cohan v. Commissioner, supra.  In so doing, we bear             
          heavily against the taxpayer, who is responsible for the                    
          uncertainty.  Id. at 543-544.  In this case, respondent has                 
          allowed a deduction equal to 31.64 percent of the amount                    
          determined as escort income in 1989 as specific expenses of                 
          petitioner’s escort business.  Petitioner has failed to establish           
          that she is entitled to larger deductions than those allowed by             
          respondent.  We therefore hold that she may deduct, as business             







Page:  Previous  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  59  60  61  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011