Henry A. Rabago - Page 4




                                        - 3 -                                         

          delivery schedule was usually completed anywhere between 11:00              
          a.m. and approximately 1:30 p.m. each day.  He generally had no             
          further duties after completing his route, although he could be             
          called upon to supplement a store's supply if the situation                 
          warranted.  Petitioner did not own the vehicle used in his                  
          deliveries, nor was he liable for the gasoline and other                    
          operational and maintenance expenses.  He was required to punch a           
          time clock each day at the commencement and at the conclusion of            
          his deliveries.  He could make deliveries only on the route                 
          designated for him by Best Foods.  Petitioner was required to bid           
          for any new route or changes to his route.  Petitioner was                  
          required to become a member of a labor union, the Teamsters,                
          which had a collective bargaining agreement with Best Foods.                
          While on his route, petitioner was required to wear a shirt that            
          bore the logo or trade names of the products he delivered.                  
          Petitioner shelved the products he delivered, solicited and                 
          accepted sales orders at each location, monitored the needs or              
          requirements of the stores on his route, and filed invoices of              
          his deliveries with Best Foods.  Petitioner also removed from               
          each delivery point any stale, unsold, or outdated goods from               
          prior deliveries.                                                           
               Petitioner did not purchase or own the products he                     
          delivered, nor did petitioner have any ownership or investment in           







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011