Henry A. Rabago - Page 5




                                        - 4 -                                         

          any of the facilities or equipment used in connection with the              
          baked goods he delivered.                                                   
               For his services, petitioner was paid a base salary plus a             
          commission on the goods he delivered.  His commissions, however,            
          were reduced for any stale or unsold goods that were removed from           
          store shelves.  Petitioner was allowed paid vacation and sick               
          leave.                                                                      
               Each year, including the years at issue, Best Foods issued             
          to petitioner an IRS Form W-2, Wage and Tax Statement, which                
          reflected the net amounts paid to petitioner for his delivery               
          services.  The payments to petitioner were characterized as                 
          wages, from which Federal and State income and Social Security              
          taxes were withheld.  Block 15 of the Form W-2, indicating                  
          whether petitioner was a statutory employee, was not marked.                
               On his Federal income tax returns for the 2 years at issue,            
          petitioner reported the income shown on his Forms W-2 as gross              
          receipts from a trade or business activity on a Schedule C,                 
          Profit or Loss From Business.  He subtracted from gross receipts            
          an amount for cost of goods sold representing the stale and                 
          unsold products he had removed from store shelves during the                
          year.  Petitioner then claimed deductions for expenses incurred             
          in the activity.                                                            
               In the notice of deficiency, respondent determined that                
          petitioner was a common-law employee, and, as such, his income              





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011