Norma A. Ramirez-Ota - Page 4




                                        - 3 -                                         

          1997 her former in-laws did not provide any other financial                 
          assistance to her or the children.  During 1997, petitioner’s               
          former father-in-law worked for the State of Arizona Department             
          of Highways, and petitioner’s former mother-in-law was studying             
          to become a teacher.                                                        
               Despite the above, petitioner stipulated that during 1997              
          and 1998, she and her children lived in a 3-bedroom home located            
          at 1217 W. Manhattan, Tempe, Arizona (Manhattan residence), owned           
          by her brother, Esau Ramirez III (brother).  Petitioner’s                   
          parents, Esau G. and Adelina B. Ramirez (parents), her brother,             
          and her younger sister also resided at the Manhattan residence.             
          While petitioner lived at the Manhattan residence, she paid a               
          monthly rent, including utilities, ranging from $110 to $120.  In           
          1998, petitioner paid the cable bill, approximately $47.56 per              
          month, for 7 months.                                                        
               During the years in issue, petitioner paid for the                     
          children’s clothing, school supplies, and some food.  While at              
          the Montebello residence, petitioner’s former in-laws paid for a            
          majority of the food and groceries.  The record does not                    
          establish the amount of utilities, mortgage payment, or other               
          expenses necessary to maintain the Montebello residence.  While             
          at the Manhattan residence, petitioner’s parents and her brother            
          paid for a majority of the food and groceries.  Petitioner’s                
          brother further testified, and petitioner did not dispute at                





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011