Norma A. Ramirez-Ota - Page 5




                                        - 4 -                                         

          trial, that monthly expenses, including the water bill of                   
          approximately $50, the electricity bill of approximately $300,              
          the mortgage payments of $615, and the telephone bill of                    
          approximately $50, were paid by either petitioner’s brother or              
          petitioner’s parents.                                                       
               Petitioner estimated her monthly expenses in 1997 and 1998             
          as follows:                                                                 
               Car and insurance payments         $477.00                             
               Rent (including utilities)         120.00                              
          Petitioner spent approximately $100 per child for school                    
          clothing.  The record does not reflect the amount paid by                   
          petitioner for her children’s school supplies.                              
               During the years in issue, petitioner was employed as a                
          clerk typist III at the Attorney General’s Office in Phoenix,               
          Arizona.  Both petitioner’s gross wage and adjusted gross income            
          for 1997 and 1998 were $14,622 and $14,838, respectively.                   
          Petitioner filed her 1997 and 1998 Federal income tax returns as            
          head of household and claimed the earned income credits.                    
               Petitioner’s parents reported adjusted gross income for 1997           
          and 1998 of $21,116 and $31,411, respectively.  Petitioner’s                
          brother filed his Federal income tax returns as head of household           
          for the years in issue.                                                     
               Respondent determined that petitioner’s filing status was              
          single, not head of household, because she did not provide over             






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011