- 9 -
prosecution and to impose sanctions under section 6673 in each of
the cases at docket Nos. 10765-00 and 10766-00.
On December 3, 2001, the Court sua sponte issued separate
Orders (December 3, 2001 Show Cause Orders) directing each party
in the case at docket No. 10764-00 in which Richards Asset
Management Trust is named as petitioner and in the case at docket
No. 10767-00 in which Richards Charitable Trust is named as
petitioner to
show cause in writing why the Court has jurisdiction
over this case, including the identity of any purported
fiduciary of petitioner and a detailed analysis of why
such purported fiduciary has the capacity to litigate
in the Court on behalf of petitioner.
On December 19, 2001, respondent filed separate written
responses to the December 3, 2001 Show Cause Orders in the cases
at docket Nos. 10764-00 and 10767-00 in which respondent con-
tended, inter alia, that Richards Management Trust and Richards
Charitable Trust, respectively,
11. * * * failed to establish that a trustee, if
authorized, acted on its behalf when the purported
petition was filed with the Court on October 16, 2000.
12. * * * failed to file a proper petition with
this Court in that the petition was not brought by and
with the full descriptive name of the fiduciary enti-
tled to institute a case on its behalf.
Respondent further argued in those separate responses to the
December 3, 2001 Show Cause Orders in the cases at docket Nos.
10764-00 and 10767-00 that
Since the petition in this case was not brought by a
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011