Richards Asset Management Trust, et al. - Page 10




                                       - 10 -                                         
               party with proper capacity as required by the Tax Court                
               Rules of Practice and Procedure, the Court lacks juris-                
               diction * * *.                                                         
               On December 20, 2001, Richards Management Trust and Richards           
          Charitable Trust filed separate written responses to the December           
          3, 2001 Show Cause Orders in the cases at docket Nos. 10764-00              
          and 10767-00 (Richards Management Trust’s response to the Decem-            
          ber 3, 2001 Show Cause Order and Richards Charitable Trust’s                
          response to the December 3, 2001 Show Cause Order, respectively),           
          each of which was signed by Terrence A. Bentivegna (Mr.                     
          Bentivegna) who identified himself in each such response as                 
          “Trustee”.  Each such response asserted that “Petitioner does not           
          believe that this Court has jurisdiction.”  In support of that              
          position, Richards Management Trust’s response to the December 3,           
          2001 Show Cause Order and Richards Charitable Trust’s response to           
          the December 3, 2001 Show Cause Order set forth statements and              
          contentions that the Court finds to be frivolous and/or ground-             
          less.6                                                                      


               6Each such response to the December 3, 2001 Show Cause Order           
          stated in pertinent part:                                                   
               1.   Petitioner petitioned this Court after having                     
                    received false and misleading information from the                
                    respondent and attorneys David Wise and his asso-                 
                    ciate Carol Jackson.  The respondent has failed to                
                    properly assess any taxes in accordance with their                
                    required administrative procedures, and yet ad-                   
                    vised the petitioner that the only method of dis-                 
                    agreeing with the purported tax liability was to                  
                    petition this Court.                                              
                                                             (continued...)           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011