Richards Asset Management Trust, et al. - Page 16




                                       - 16 -                                         
          under Ohio law, see Rule 60(c), a trustee generally is the proper           
          party authorized to act on behalf of a trust.  Firestone v.                 
          Galbreath, 976 F.2d 279, 284 (6th Cir. 1992); Saxton v.                     
          Seiberling, 48 Ohio St. 554, 29 N.E. 179 (1891); see Ohio R. Civ.           
          P. 17(A).11                                                                 
               In the cases at docket Nos. 10764-00 and 10767-00, Richards            
          Management Trust and Richards Charitable Trust, respectively,               
          have the burden of proving that this Court has jurisdiction, see            
          Fehrs v. Commissioner, 65 T.C. 346, 348 (1975); Natl. Comm. to              
          Secure Justice in the Rosenberg Case v. Commissioner, 27 T.C.               
          837, 839 (1957), by establishing affirmatively all facts giving             
          rise to our jurisdiction, see Wheeler’s Peachtree Pharmacy, Inc.            
          v. Commissioner, 35 T.C. 177, 180 (1960); Consol. Cos. v. Commis-           
          sioner, 15 B.T.A. 645, 651 (1929).  In order to meet that burden,           
          Richards Management Trust in the case at docket No. 10764-00 and            
          Richards Charitable Trust in the case at docket No. 10767-00 must           


               11Ohio R. Civ. P. 17(A) provides in pertinent part:                    
               RULE 17.  Parties plaintiff and defendant; capacity                    
                    (A) Real party in interest.  Every action shall be                
               prosecuted in the name of the real party in interest.                  
               An executor, administrator, guardian, bailee, trustee                  
               of an express trust, a party with whom or in whose name                
               a contract has been made for the benefit of another, or                
               a party authorized by statute may sue in his name as                   
               such representative without joining with him the party                 
               for whose benefit the action is brought. * * * [Empha-                 
               sis added.]                                                            






Page:  Previous  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011