John A. and Donna L. Rowe - Page 7




                                        - 7 -                                         
          capital gains, mortgage interest, and charitable contributions              
          items which were allocable to her because they were not erroneous           
          items “of” Mr. Rowe.  We then held that petitioner was entitled             
          to equitable relief under section 6015(f) for the portions of the           
          capital gains, mortgage interest, and charitable contributions              
          items giving rise to deficiencies which were allocable to her.              
          Finally, on the basis of the parties’ concessions and section               
          6015(f), we concluded that petitioner was not liable for any of             
          the remaining disputed additions to tax or penalties.                       
          Discussion                                                                  
               Section 7430(a)(2) provides that a party that has prevailed            
          in any court proceeding against the United States may be awarded            
          reasonable litigation costs incurred in connection with the court           
          proceeding.  To obtain such an award, the prevailing party must             
          establish that:  (1) She has exhausted the administrative                   
          remedies available; (2) she has substantially prevailed in the              
          controversy; (3) the position of the United States in the                   
          proceeding was not substantially justified; (4) she satisfies               
          certain net worth requirements; (5) she has not unreasonably                
          protracted the proceeding; and (6) the amount of the costs sought           
          is reasonable.  Sec. 7430(b) and (c).  Petitioner bears the                 
          burden of proving that she satisfies each of these requirements.            
          Rule 232(e); Grant v. Commissioner, 103 F.3d 948, 952 (11th Cir.            
          1996), affg. per curiam T.C. Memo. 1995-374; Gantner v.                     






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011