John A. and Donna L. Rowe - Page 15




                                       - 15 -                                         
          of the capital gains, mortgage interest, and charitable                     
          contributions allocable to Mr. Rowe.  Thus, petitioner did not              
          prevail on the issue of whether she was entitled to relief under            
          section 6015(b) for these items, and we find that respondent’s              
          position was substantially justified.10                                     
                    2.   Section 6015(c)                                              
               Section 6015(c) provides relief from joint liability for               
          spouses either no longer married, legally separated, or living              
          apart.  Generally, this avenue of relief allows a spouse to elect           
          to be treated, for purposes of determining tax liability, as if             
          separate returns had been filed.  The electing spouse must first            
          establish the portion of any deficiency allocable to her.  Sec.             
          6015(c)(2).  The electing spouse cannot qualify for relief under            
          section 6015(c) for the portion which is allocable to her.  The             
          electing spouse may be entitled to relief under section 6015(c)             
          for the portion which is not allocable to her unless the                    
          Commissioner can demonstrate that she had “actual knowledge”, at            
          the time she signed the return, of the item giving rise to the              
          deficiency.  Sec. 6015(c)(3)(C).                                            



               10In her motion, petitioner also claims that she would have            
          been entitled to relief for all items under former sec. 6013(e).            
          However, former sec. 6013(e) also predicated relief on a finding            
          that the understatement was attributable to an erroneous item               
          “of” the nonelecting spouse.  Former sec. 6013(e)(1)(B); Bokum v.           
          Commissioner, 94 T.C. 126, 140 (1990), affd. 992 F.2d 1132 (11th            
          Cir. 1993).                                                                 





Page:  Previous  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011