John A. and Donna L. Rowe - Page 17




                                       - 17 -                                         
          periodic financial statements in her name were sent to her                  
          address, and petitioner herself testified that she usually picked           
          up the mail and opened the letters addressed to her.                        
               Section 6015(d)(3)(A) provides that, generally, an item                
          giving rise to a deficiency on a joint return is allocated                  
          between the electing spouse and the former spouse in the same               
          manner as it would have been allocated if they had filed separate           
          returns for the taxable year.  Additionally, the legislative                
          history of section 6015(c) indicates that this type of income               
          item is expected generally to be allocated on the basis of the              
          source of the income and the ownership of the item giving rise to           
          the income.  S. Rept. 105-174, at 56 (1998), 1998-3 C.B. 537,               
          592.  Petitioner bore the burden of establishing the allocation             
          of this item under section 6015(c), and, largely on the basis of            
          her testimony at trial, we found that petitioner established that           
          the item was allocable to Mr. Rowe.  However, on the basis of the           
          facts known to respondent and the relevant legal precedent, we              
          believe that respondent had a reasonable basis in both law and              
          fact for arguing that this item was allocable to petitioner and             
          she was not entitled to relief under section 6015(c).                       
                         b.   Capital Gains                                           
               In 1987 and 1988, properties that were jointly titled in               
          petitioner’s and Mr. Rowe’s names were sold.  The checks                    
          representing the proceeds of the sales were issued payable to               






Page:  Previous  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011