- 33 -
of Chief Counsel in Honolulu, Hawaii. Mr. Hochman has been
practicing law since at least 1982. Respondent asks
reimbursement at a rate of $200 an hour for Mr. Hochman’s time.
Mr. Sulla does not question the reasonableness of that rate. All
of the hours claimed for Mr. Hochman were expended after Mr.
Sulla filed the status report. We believe that 21.75 hours was
reasonably necessary for Mr. Hochman to do the work he described.
We find that $200 is a reasonable hourly charge for Mr. Hochman’s
time and that he reasonably expended 21.75 excess hours on this
litigation. The lodestar amount for Mr. Hochman’s time is
$4,350.
The total lodestar amount for the time of Mr. Lau and Mr.
Hochman is $10,500. Respondent has not itemized costs for travel
expense, photocopying, or supplies used in preparing the cases.
Respondent limits his request for costs to the total lodestar
amount. We shall require Mr. Sulla to pay costs in that amount.
5. Conclusion
We find that $10,500 is a reasonable amount for respondent’s
excess attorney’s fees incurred by reason of Mr. Sulla’s
unreasonable and vexatious multiplication of these proceedings.
Therefore, we shall make the order to show cause absolute and
order Mr. Sulla personally to pay respondent $10,500 pursuant to
section 6673(a)(2), that he make payment by means of a certified
check, cashier’s check, or money order in favor of the Internal
Page: Previous 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 NextLast modified: May 25, 2011