- 20 - to its value. Mr. Cox concluded that the work was “merely incidental repairs”. Respondent presented Robert Graham from Gudgel/Yancey Roofing, Inc., the person who supervised the roof work on the Cirby/Sunrise shopping center. We found Mr. Graham’s testimony to be honest, forthright, and credible. Mr. Graham testified that the work was a “re-roofing project” in which: We go to a roofing system that’s old and needs to be replaced, and we go there and we tear it off. We remove the roofing from the existing plywood, and then by the time everything is torn off, we’ll be looking at old plywood. We replace whatever needs to be replaced in the way of plywood, and then we go–-start installing our roofing systems. * * * Mr. Graham stated that he replaced the entire builtup portion of the roof, but “that is the entire roof”. Mr. Graham stated that he reviewed the work during its application and on completion with the representative of the roofing system manufacturer because the new roof is under warranty for 10 years. After considering the work completed and Mr. Graham’s credible testimony, we find that petitioner replaced the roof. Additionally, the replacement roof is expected to last 10 years, prolonging the roof’s useful life. We believe that the replacement of the builtup portion of the roof was of aPage: Previous 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011