- 2 - $5,285.24, and $3,755.53.1 Petitioners, under section 6330,2 seek review by this Court of respondent’s determination. The parties’ controversy poses the following issues for our consideration: (1) Whether we have jurisdiction over petitioners’ 1995 tax liability; (2) if we have jurisdiction over petitioners’ 1995 tax liability, whether petitioners are entitled to question the merits of the underlying tax liability; (3) whether petitioners are liable for the 1996 and 1997 income tax liabilities; and (4) whether there was an abuse of discretion in respondent’s determination to proceed with collection. FINDINGS OF FACT Petitioners, James Anderson and Cheryl Latos, were married and resided in Wood River Junction, Rhode Island, at the time their petition was filed. During 1995 through 1997, Mr. Anderson worked as a fisherman on boats with crews of less than 10 people. Petitioners filed joint Federal income tax returns for their 1995, 1996, and 1997 tax years. On each return, the income from Mr. Anderson’s fishing activity was reported on a Schedule C. No 1 Respondent made a separate determination with respect to petitioners’ 1994 tax liability. Respondent, however, moved to dismiss the 1994 year for lack of jurisdiction. Respondent’s motion was granted for reasons explained in Anderson v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2000-311. 2 All section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the years in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure, unless otherwise indicated.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011