James E. Anderson and Cheryl J. Latos - Page 6

                                        - 6 -                                         
          the boat owners were employers who were required to withhold                
          income and FICA tax from Mr. Anderson.  In that vein, they argued           
          that the failure of the boat owners to withhold relieved                    
          petitioners from any obligation to pay income or FICA tax.                  
               Pursuant to the Appeals officer’s suggestion, petitioners              
          submitted Forms 1040X, Amended U.S. Individual Tax Returns, for             
          1996 and 1997, claiming that they were not liable for the income            
          tax that they had reported on their original 1996 and 1997                  
          returns.  The Appeals officer forwarded petitioners’ amended 1996           
          and 1997 tax returns to the examination division where                      
          petitioners’ 1996 and 1997 original returns were already under              
          examination concerning whether they were liable for self-                   
          employment tax.  The examination division considered and denied             
          petitioners’ claims that they were not liable for the 1996 and              
          1997 income tax and notified them of the denial by sending                  
          petitioners the revenue agent’s report, on August 3, 1999.                  
               After review of the problem resolution officer’s notes, the            
          Appeals officer concluded that the problem resolution officer had           
          not sufficiently reduced petitioners’ 1995 self-employment                  
          liability to the amount that Mr. Anderson would have owed if he             
          were an employee.  On January 17, 2001, the Appeals officer                 
          recommended that petitioners’ 1995 tax liability be reduced by an           
          additional $797.58.  The $797.58 adjustment was made on March 12,           
          2001.                                                                       






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011