- 15 - forgiven, those amounts represent income that reduces dollar for dollar any amount used in computing the NOL. Thus, whether the amounts that Mr. Trudell and Mr. Coghan contributed were loans that were forgiven,13 or amounts those parties invested in the project, petitioners have not established that they paid those amounts into the project.14 As such, petitioners have substantiated $1,812,799.9815 as amounts that they paid into the land purchase. 2. Costs in Selling 3 and 9 Isabella Petitioners substantiated to our satisfaction that they incurred $60,634.76 in closing and settlement costs with respect to the sale of 3 Isabella. The record also reflects that $100,000 was paid to Mr. Trudell to release his lien with respect 13We have given Mr. Assaad credit for the $100,000 that was paid to Mr. Trudell. See infra. 14One of respondent’s primary contentions on brief is that Mr. Assaad and Mr. Trudell, and perhaps Mr. Coughan, were engaged in a partnership and that petitioners have not shown that the costs and losses resulting from the Atherton houses belonged to them as opposed to other partners. Although there is some evidence in the record which might suggest a partnership between Mr. Assaad and Mr. Trudell, the evidence is not sufficient for us to conclude that there was a partnership. Further, there is no basis in the record for allocating the costs and losses to the other alleged partners and for making adjustments, if any, to the amounts realized from the sale and foreclosure of the Atherton properties. 15This amount is equal to the $1.46 million land loan plus the $422,397.50 deposit or earnest money, plus the $130,402.48 credit for the amount paid before escrow plus the $200,000 deposit retained, and minus the $400,000 received from Mr. Trudell and Mr. Coghan.Page: Previous 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011