- 17 - substantiate this alleged expense. The first document dated January 24, 1992, shows an unpaid principal balance on the Pacific loan of $1.95 million. The second document dated December 2, 1992, shows the amount of unpaid debt as $2,052,385.23. Petitioners surmise that the difference in the two amounts must constitute foreclosure expenses. We disagree. Petitioners have not established to our satisfaction that the difference represents expenses which offset the amount realized on the foreclosure of 15 Isabella. 4. Construction Expenses The vast majority of the expenses which petitioners claim with respect to the 1992 NOL relate to the costs of construction in the Atherton project. Petitioners have failed to produce any records which directly substantiate any of those construction expenses. Instead of producing direct evidence of those expenses, petitioners rely on indirect evidence. They seek to use the amounts of the various construction and other loans as a proxy for estimating the amount of the construction expenses. If the taxpayer fails to keep adequate records but the Court is convinced that deductible expenditures were incurred, the Court should make as close an approximation as it can, bearing heavily if it chooses upon the taxpayer whose inexactitude is of his own making. Cohan v. Commissioner, 39 F.2d 540, 544 (2d Cir. 1930); Shea v. Commissioner, 112 T.C. 183, 187 (1999); see alsoPage: Previous 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011