-146- remaining 54 swaps (173 - 119), 9 were with counterparties that did not ultimately hail from a G-10 or European Union country. Many, if not most, of FNBC’s swaps with foreign counterparties were with other dealers, who while not subject to U.S. bankruptcy laws, were extremely well capitalized and were most unlikely to default on their obligations. 4. Practicability of Accounting for Netting If a dealer had a legally enforceable netting agreement with a counterparty, then it would be preferable for the dealer to calculate the credit exposure for all of the swaps with the counterparty on an aggregate (i.e., netted) basis. This was the recommendation of the G-30 report. During the relevant years, FNBC was capable of measuring credit exposure on an aggregate (netted) basis by way of the program designed for it by Hsieh in 1988. 5. Impact of the Failure To Account for Netting FNBC’s failure to account for netting produced large and systematic biases. FNBC’s failure to take netting into account produced substantial large exposures that were larger than the actual risks under the individual agreements. 52(...continued) proceedings.Page: Previous 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011