Bank One Corporation - Page 151

                                        -228-                                         
          credit risk from the counterparty.  On the other hand, Parsons              
          stated, the dealer may have to make a downward credit adjustment            
          if the swap becomes significantly off-market to the dealer’s                
          advantage, regardless of the relative credit ratings of the                 
          dealer and its counterparty.                                                
               Duffie disagreed with the related analysis of petitioner’s             
          experts that rested on the premise that only the credit quality             
          of the dealer’s counterparty should be considered when making a             
          credit-risk adjustment, and that the relative quality of the                
          dealer itself is irrelevant.  Duffie stated:                                
               consider the case of interest-rate swaps, with two                     
               possible dealers, Gilt and Silver, and an outside                      
               counterparty, Z, that wishes to pay the floating rate.                 
               We will ignore all adjustments except for credit.                      
               Suppose the outside counterparty X is rated AA, that                   
               Gilt is rated AA, and that Silver is rated BBB.                        
               Suppose Z calls Gilt and asks for the fixed rate R to                  
               be paid by Gilt that would be set so that there is no                  
               initial exchange of cash, meaning that the fair market                 
               value of this swap between Z and Gilt is zero.                         
                    Now, suppose Z calls the lower-quality dealer                     
               Silver in order to obtain an interest rate swap under                  
               which Z pays floating and Silver pays the same fixed                   
               rate R.  They negotiate a price P for this swap (under                 
               the same standard of willing buyer and seller used in                  
               the definition of “fair market value”) to be paid by                   
               Silver to Z.  The price is greater than zero because Z                 
               was willing to receive a price of zero under the same                  
               contractual terms when trading with the higher-quality                 
               dealer Gilt.  He would be unwilling to trade at a price                
               of zero with Silver, but rather would demand some                      
               higher price as compensation for bearing the comparably                
               higher credit risk of Silver.  This means an upward                    
               adjustment in the market value of the swap to Silver,                  
               relative to the price of zero obtained by Gilt.  This                  
               refutes the claim that Silver’s own credit quality                     






Page:  Previous  218  219  220  221  222  223  224  225  226  227  228  229  230  231  232  233  234  235  236  237  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011