Bank One Corporation - Page 174

                                        -249-                                         
                                     APPENDIX A                                       
               STIPULATION WITH RESPECT TO COURT APPOINTED EXPERTS                    
                    WHEREAS, the parties are engaged in complex civil                 
               tax litigation involving novel issues of first                         
               impression and significant importance; and                             
                    WHEREAS, the parties each have their own experts                  
               to opine on certain issues; and                                        
                    WHEREAS, the Honorable David Laro, the Judge in                   
               this matter, has indicated that he believes it would be                
               helpful to have two experts appointed by the Court                     
               pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 706 to opine on                   
               certain issues which permeate these cases, and                         
                    WHEREAS, Judge Laro has asked that the parties                    
               jointly consider and stipulate as to the duties and                    
               procedures involved in the appointment of the Court’s                  
               experts,                                                               
                    NOW THEREFORE, the parties do hereby stipulate to                 
               the following:                                                         
               1.0 That the Court may appoint Dr. J. Darrell Duffie                   
               and Mr. Barry S. Sziklay as the Court’s experts to                     
               assist the trier of fact in the above-entitled matter.                 
               1.1 That Dr. J. Darrell Duffie may be appointed as an                  
               expert in the field of financial economics and                         
               financial derivatives and will be asked to opine on the                
               following questions in the context of these cases, and,                
               specifically, with regard to this petitioner:                          
                    a.  The relative merits and deficiencies in                       
                    the various expert reports and opinions of                        
                    petitioner’s and respondent’s experts.                            
                    b.  The generally accepted method or                              
                    methodologies of valuing the derivatives at                       
                    issue in this case.                                               
                    c.  With respect to the midmarket method of                       
                    valuation, what adjustments, if any, should                       
                    be made in order to arrive at the “fair                           
                    market value” of the derivative?                                  






Page:  Previous  239  240  241  242  243  244  245  246  247  248  249  250  251  252  253  254  255  256  257  258  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011