- 5 - the years in issue, and she verified that all applicable laws and administrative procedures had been met. Appeals Officer Jenkins also provided petitioner copies of his transcripts of account for the years in issue. Appeals Officer Jenkins provided petitioner several opportunities to raise issues other than the delegation of authority, including collection alternatives (such as an installment agreement or an offer-in-compromise). Petitioner stated that he was not interested in discussing collection alternatives and that he wanted to terminate the hearing. Respondent acceded to petitioner’s wishes, and the hearing ended. On March 18, 2002, respondent issued a Notice of Determination Concerning Collection Action(s) Under Section 6320 and/or 6330 (notice of determination) to petitioner regarding his 1996, 1997, and 1998 tax years. In the notice of determination, respondent determined that (1) prior to the filing of the tax lien, all statutory, administrative, and procedural requirements had been met, (2) no viable collection alternatives were established, and (3) the tax lien was not considered to be overly intrusive. On March 27, 2002, respondent mailed petitioner certified certificates of assessments, payments, and other specified matters for the years in issue. On April 1, 2002, petitioner timely filed an imperfect petition for lien or levy action under Code section 6320(c) orPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011