- 8 - administrative procedure has been met. Nestor v. Commissioner, 118 T.C. 162, 166-167 (2002). In any event, respondent gave petitioner copies of his transcripts of account for the years in issue at, and subsequent to, the hearing. We have repeatedly held that the Commissioner may rely on transcripts of account to satisfy the verification requirement of section 6330(c)(1). E.g., Eiselstein v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2003-22. Petitioner has not alleged any irregularity in the assessment procedure that would raise a question about the validity of the assessments or the information contained in the transcripts of account. Davis v. Commissioner, 115 T.C. 35, 41 (2000); Mann v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2002-48. Accordingly, we hold that the verification requirement of section 6330(c)(1) has been satisfied. Cf. Nicklaus v. Commissioner, 117 T.C. 117, 120-121 (2001). Petitioner claims in the petition that he was not accorded a hearing that complied with section 6330 because as part of the hearing he was not able to summon witnesses, cross-examine witnesses, conduct discovery, examine documents, or obtain evidence from respondent. We have repeatedly held that section 6330 hearings are informal, and that the compulsory attendance of witnesses or production of documents is not required. Katz v. Commissioner, 115 T.C. 329, 337 (2000); Davis v. Commissioner, supra at 41-42.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011