- 2 - and Procedure. The Court agrees with and adopts the opinion of the Special Trial Judge, which is set forth below. OPINION OF THE SPECIAL TRIAL JUDGE WOLFE, Special Trial Judge: In a so-called affected items notice of deficiency, respondent determined additions to tax with respect to petitioners’ 1982 Federal income tax of $6,116 under section 6659 for valuation overstatement, $1,495 under section 6653(a)(1) for negligence, and under section 6653(a)(2) in an amount equal to 50 percent of the interest due on $29,894, the amount of the underpayment attributable to negligence. The underpayment was determined pursuant to a partnership-level proceeding.1 See secs. 6221-6233. After concessions,2 there are two issues remaining for decision. The first issue is whether petitioners are liable for the additions to tax under the provisions of section 6653(a)(1) and (2) for negligence or 1 The deficiency notice apparently is based on the assumption that petitioners invested $25,000 in SAB Foam Recycling Associates (SAB Foam) in 1982. In these proceedings petitioner testified that he invested $12,500, and the parties have stipulated the amounts of petitioners’ losses and credits claimed on their 1982 tax return on the basis of a $12,500 investment in SAB Foam. See infra note 6 and accompanying text. 2 By stipulation, petitioners concede the imposition of the valuation overstatement addition to tax under sec. 6659. In addition, petitioners concede that the limitations period remains open for assessment and collection of any penalties, additions to tax, or interest attributable to partnership items for the 1982 tax year that may be held to be due from petitioners. Petitioners previously raised the statute of limitations as a defense in their petition.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011