- 20 -
exercise under the circumstances. See Neely v. Commissioner, 85
T.C. 934, 947-948 (1985). The pertinent question is whether a
particular taxpayer’s actions are reasonable in light of the
taxpayer’s experience, the nature of the investment, and the
taxpayer’s actions in connection with the transactions. See
Henry Schwartz Corp. v. Commissioner, 60 T.C. 728, 740 (1973);
see also Turner v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1995-363 (“When
considering the negligence addition, we evaluate the particular
facts of each case, judging the relative sophistication of the
taxpayers as well as the manner in which the taxpayers approached
their investment.”). The determination of negligence is factual.
Respondent determined that petitioners are liable for
negligence under section 6653(a)(1) and (2) with respect to the
underpayment of tax attributable to petitioners’ investment in
SAB Foam. Respondent’s determination of negligence is presumed
correct, and petitioners have the burden of proving that they
were not negligent. See Rule 142(a); Welch v. Helvering, 290
U.S. 111, 115 (1933); see also Addington v. Commissioner, supra;
Goldman v. Commissioner, 39 F.3d 402, 407 (2d Cir. 1994), affg.
T.C. Memo. 1993-480; Luman v. Commissioner, 79 T.C. 846, 860-861
(1982); Bixby v. Commissioner, 58 T.C. 757, 791-792 (1972).9
9 Cf. sec. 7491(c), which places the burden of production
on the Commissioner with respect to a taxpayer’s liability for
penalties and additions to tax. Sec. 7491(c) is effective for
court proceedings arising in connection with examinations
(continued...)
Page: Previous 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 NextLast modified: May 25, 2011