Robert S. Cohen and Margery Cohen - Page 17

                                       - 17 -                                         
               According to their 1982 Federal income tax return,                     
          petitioners invested $12,500 and acquired a 1.455882-percent                
          limited partnership interest in SAB Foam’s profits, losses, and             
          capital.  On their 1982 tax return, petitioners claimed an                  
          ordinary loss of $9,646 from SAB Foam and an investment and                 
          energy tax credit of $20,385.7                                              
                                       OPINION                                        
               We have decided many Plastics Recycling cases.  Most of                
          these cases, like the present case, have presented issues                   
          regarding additions to tax for negligence.  See, e.g., Weitzman             
          v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2001-215; Thornsjo v. Commissioner,             
          T.C. Memo. 2001-129; West v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2000-389;             

               7  The parties have stipulated that petitioners’ 1982                  
          distributable share of SAB Foam’s loss was $9,646, that he                  
          claimed as unadjusted basis of new recovery property eligible for           
          investment credit $101,912 resulting in a credit of $20,385, and            
          that petitioners reported these amounts on their 1982 Federal               
          income tax return.  These numbers are consistent with a quarter             
          unit investment of $12,500, which petitioner testified to, and a            
          1.455882-percent limited partnership interest.                              
               The parties also stipulate the accuracy of the SAB Foam 1982           
          income tax return and the Form 1065 Schedules K-1, Partner’s                
          Share of Income, Credits, Deductions, etc., attached to that                
          return.  According to the Schedule K-1 that SAB Foam prepared for           
          petitioners, petitioners invested $25,000, a half unit                      
          investment, and received a 2.911764-percent limited partnership             
          interest in SAB Foam.  This schedule shows a distributable share            
          of SAB Foam loss of $19,292 and unadjusted basis of new recovery            
          property of $203,823.  The stipulations are inconsistent, and               
          petitioners’ 1982 Federal income tax return is inconsistent with            
          his 1982 Schedule K-1 issued by SAB Foam.                                   
               The amounts of penalty in issue have not been disputed by              
          the parties, although liability for penalties is in dispute.                





Page:  Previous  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011