- 2 - Revenue Code in effect for the years in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure. Respondent determined deficiencies in petitioner’s Federal income taxes and additions to tax as follows: Addition to Tax Year Deficiency Sec. 6651(a)(1) 11995 $1,380 $532 1998 12,968 3,242 1 The Court permitted respondent to amend his answer to assert a claim for an increased deficiency for 1995 in the amount of $7,651 and an increase in addition to tax in the amount of $1,725.75. Thus, the deficiency in dispute for 1995 is $9,031 and the addition to tax in dispute for that year is $2,257.75. The increase in deficiency and addition to tax is based on respondent’s claim that the notice of deficiency for 1995 incorrectly assumed that $7,651 was assessed. Respondent asserts that the assessment had been erroneously abated prior to issuance of the notice of deficiency. The issues for decision are: (1) Whether petitioner is entitled to all or any part of a claimed casualty loss deduction, and (2) whether the petitioner is liable for the additions to tax for late filing pursuant to section 6651(a)(1), as determined by respondent. Additional adjustments in the notice of deficiency are computational in nature and will flow from our resolution of the casualty loss issue. Background Some of the facts are stipulated, and they are so found. The stipulation of facts and the attached exhibits are incorporated herein by this reference. At the time of filing her petition, petitioner resided in Tinton Falls, New Jersey.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011