Pamela S. Cooper - Page 8

                                        - 7 -                                         
               Petitioner allocated $10,000 of insurance reimbursement to             
          the real property.  At about the same time as the filing of the             
          1998 return, petitioner also filed a Form 1045, Application for             
          Tentative Refund.  Petitioner sought to carry back the casualty             
          loss claimed on the 1998 return to the 1995 through 1997 tax                
          years.  The application for tentative refund was denied by                  
          respondent.  Also, during the year 2000, petitioner submitted2 a            
          Form 1040X, U.S. Amended Individual Income Tax Return, for 1994.            
          In the Form 1040X, petitioner sought to reverse the claimed                 
          casualty loss deduction of $95,311 on the theory that it was now            
          being claimed on the 1998 return and carried back to 1995.                  
               Respondent’s position is that petitioner has not established           
          that the failure of the washing machine hose, and subsequent                
          damage, constitute a casualty within the meaning of section 165.            
          Respondent does not dispute that if a casualty occurred, 1998               
          would be the proper year to claim the loss.  Respondent further             
          argues that even if a casualty occurred, that petitioner has not            
          presented sufficient evidence to prove the amount of the                    
          casualty.                                                                   
          Discussion                                                                  

               2  The record does not reflect whether the Form 1040X for              
          1994 was filed, or whether a remittance was sent with the amended           
          return.  Given respondent’s position in this matter, we assume              
          that petitioner did not receive the benefit of the casualty loss            
          deduction claimed on the 1994 return as originally filed and                
          after consideration of the Form 1040X revising the claimed                  
          casualty loss deduction.                                                    





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011