- 10 - record, we find that petitioner may not challenge the existence or the amount of petitioner’s unpaid liability for 1998. See sec. 6330(c)(2)(B); Sego v. Commissioner, 114 T.C. 604, 610-611 (2000); Goza v. Commissioner, 114 T.C. 176, 182-183 (2000). Where, as is the case here, the validity of the underlying tax liability is not properly placed at issue, the Court will review the determination of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue for abuse of discretion. Sego v. Commissioner, supra at 610; Goza v. Commissioner, supra at 181-182. As was true of petitioner’s attachment to his 1998 return, petitioner’s March 6, 2000 letter, and petitioner’s attachment to Form 12153, petitioner’s response contains contentions, argu- ments, and requests that the Court finds to be frivolous and/or groundless. To illustrate, petitioner contends that respondent failed to issue petitioner the “statutory Notice and Demand for payment”. We reject that contention. Form 4340 with respect to petitioner’s taxable year 1998 shows that respondent sent peti- tioner a notice of balance due on August 7, 2000, the same day on which respondent assessed petitioner’s tax, as well as any penalties and interest as provided by law, for his taxable year 1998. A notice of balance due constitutes the notice and demand for payment under section 6303(a). Craig v. Commissioner, 119 T.C. 252, 262-263 (2002). As a further illustration of the frivolous and/or groundlessPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011