- 13 - In respondent’s motion, respondent requests that the Court require petitioner to pay a penalty to the United States pursuant to section 6673(a)(1). Section 6673(a)(1) authorizes the Court to require a taxpayer to pay to the United States a penalty in an amount not to exceed $25,000 whenever it appears to the Court, inter alia, that a proceeding before it was instituted or main- tained primarily for delay, sec. 6673(a)(1)(A), or that the taxpayer’s position in such a proceeding is frivolous or ground- less, sec. 6673(a)(1)(B). In Pierson v. Commissioner, 115 T.C. 576, 581 (2000), we issued an unequivocal warning to taxpayers concerning the imposi- tion of a penalty under section 6673(a) on those taxpayers who abuse the protections afforded by sections 6320 and 6330 by instituting or maintaining actions under those sections primarily for delay or by taking frivolous or groundless positions in such actions.3 In the instant case, petitioner advances, we believe primar- ily for delay, frivolous and/or groundless contentions, argu- ments, and requests, thereby causing the Court to waste its limited resources. We shall impose a penalty on petitioner pursuant to section 6673(a)(1) in the amount of $2,000. 3The record in this case reflects that the Appeals officer gave petitioner a copy of the Court’s opinion in Pierson v. Commissioner, 115 T.C. 576 (2000), and warned petitioner that the Court could impose penalties on petitioner for making frivolous arguments to the Court.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011